It was 20 years ago today...
December 7 2004
Today is really the day -- 20 years ago,
Ray Ozzie, Tim Halvorsen, and Len Kawell founded Iris Associates. Five
years later, on December 7, 1989, Lotus Notes 1.0 shipped, and the software
world hasn't been the same since.
If it had not been for IBM, I highly doubt that Notes would still be on
the radar today. When IBM acquired Lotus in 1995, the company was
struggling following two missteps -- the well-known effort to build 1-2-3
for OS/2 before Windows, and the less-well-known huge bet on AT&T Network
Notes, just as the worldwide web and commercial internet were mainstreaming.
Someone was going to buy Lotus, and it was Lou Gerstner's
genius that he did so in an opportunistic, yet sensible way. Lotus
was left to "run as a subsidiary", but let's be real about history
here -- without Uncle Lou's wallet, things would have been very different.
Selling Notes in the early days was not easy. My colleagues and I
used to joke that "nobody woke up in the morning saying, 'today I'd
like to buy some groupware'." Lotus on its own had sold about
two million seats of Notes, first for the bundle price of US$62,500 (100
users and a server), then for a per-user (or server) price of US$495. Notes
was primarily a departmental solution in those days -- few companies could
afford, or understand, an enterprise-wide deployment. Almost always,
the sale was solution-led. Ozzie recounts the "Nifty Fifty"
templates in last
week's Network World interview;
he also mentions the success of the Lotus partner program in developing
an ISV market for Notes. I also remember that Notes 3.2 (or 3..3?)
shipped with a fully-functioning version of Lotus's own internal customer
support system (CSERV); I wonder if anyone actually deployed it?
There were two watershed moments where Notes's success was ensured. The
first was when Lotus realized that the market for e-mail was shifting from
mainframe and/or file-sharing architectures to client/server. In
1993, at the cc:Mail Interchange conference, Lotus announced the Lotus
Communications Server, being built as part of Notes 4.0. I was in
the audience as a customer, intrigued by this new announcement but unsure
what it really meant for my cc:Mail environment. I was quoted in
PCWeek (on page one, no less) as saying, "It sounds interesting, but
there's basically no product here". And it took time for that
product to ship, the MTAs to mature, the market to be ready. The
shift from a departmental 75-users-on-OS/2-over-NETBIOS solution to an
enterprise mail server came just at the right time. Combine that
with the second watershed, when Mike Zisman made the gutsy move to drop
the price of Notes to US$70 a user, and the messaging wars were upon us.
The interesting challenge at the time was that Lotus had two e-mail products
on the books, neither one quite the right product for the market. I
often wonder how different things would have been if a) the first "Lotus
Notes Express" had been called "cc:Mail client/server edition",
and b) it had been licensed to cc:Mail users at no charge (or as part of
maintenance). A lot of customers and prospects at the time wanted
the features and capabilities of the client/server system -- great offline
support, better security, better managability -- with the usability and
ease of deployment of the file-sharing architecture. My colleagues
and I spent two+ years in one pitched battle for an enterprise messaging
decision, where we were told that Notes had the features that mattered,
and when 4.0 showed up with an improved user experience, they'd be quite
happy with it -- only to lose to Exchange (4.0!) because of organizational
politics.
Given that challenge, dropping the price and going for market share was
exactly the right move. Of course, just as that effort ramped up,
the Internet was mainstream, and destined to kill Notes. Ozzie and
company didn't take this threat lightly, and built an ambitious product
plan for Notes R5. It was exciting enough for me to want to be part
of it, and I picked up and moved into product management. I moved
to Boston just as Lotus acquired Ubique and Databeam, and went to beta
with R5. Clearly, R5 became a seminal release -- not just in terms
of the technological leap forward, but also because it came at the height
of the software market's dot-cominance, and had a huge marketing budget
for launch. Those were heady days, memories of Denis Leary ads and
"I AM" signs and kodo drummers and all that crazy stuff. But
it wasn't just a launch -- it was the work that cemented Notes's position
as the leader in corporate e-mail and collaboration.
The last few years have seen the maturing
of that market, though impressively, there are still thousands of companies
installing their first Domino servers this year. Ray and the other
Iris founders have moved on to other inventions and innovations. Still,
despite what seems like almost annual pronouncements of its death, Notes
not only lives on -- but with the seventh version now in beta, and concrete
evolution plans for the future, it seems certain that Notes will remain
a key part of the corporate software landscape -- perhaps for the next
15 or 20 years.
Post a Comment
- 2
Brian Benz http://www.softwaresoapbox.com | 12/7/2004 12:21:44 PM
Yeah, we used CSERV, and heavily customized it as part of an early CRM app in 1994/1995. I've posted my thoughts and consolidated my previous nostalgia [Edited: see his blog's top level page ]
- 3
Brian Benz http://www.softwaresoapbox.com | 12/7/2004 12:47:14 PM
ow! Stubbed my link on this template again! Ow! :)
- 4
Stan Rogers http://stanrogers.blogspot.com | 12/7/2004 12:57:35 PM
I was thinkin' Notes, but now I can't get that damned song out of my head (it resets everytime Ringo's about to start singing).
- 5
Ted Stanton http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=416 | 12/7/2004 1:17:18 PM
Wow. I can remember when my Dad first deployed Notes 3 for a company and showed me the features one day after the middle school. Little did I know I would be working with IBM ten years latter specializing in Lotus collaborative software.
- 6
Brian Benz http://www.softwaresoapbox.com | 12/7/2004 3:31:09 PM
stan: Yeah, me too. Can't stop it, but it makes it more fun to mess with the lyrics each time around.
so far I got Brilly shears, and Sargeant Papow's lonely hearts club band....
- 7
Ed Brill www.edbrill.com | 12/7/2004 3:57:58 PM
Hmmm, "Brilly shears"... nah. I have a better name.
- 8
Brian Benz http://www.softwaresoapbox.com | 12/7/2004 4:33:49 PM
Lol - hey, I didn't say it was good....but I do like the Papows ref, works on a couple of levels...
- 9
Ben Rose http://blog.jaffacake.net | 12/8/2004 5:21:54 AM
LOL @ Papows gag...I had the pleasure of meeting him once.
I used Notes on my very first day on my very first job and have the pleasure of only ever working with that product as a specialist. Although obviously OS, TCP/IP and other skills have been required along the way.
- 10
Devin Olson http://www.devinolson.net | 12/8/2004 11:02:33 AM
Happy birthday Notes!
Trackback: { Link }
Let me also take this opportunity to thank you Ed, for all your hard work. I don't think you know how much you are truly appreciated by all of us out here in "the field".
-Devin.
- 11
| 3/10/2005 11:16:24 AM
hi, slashdot.


Hey Ed -- some comments here: { Link }